financetom
News
financetom
/
News
/
Brooklyn Org explains its recent name change: ‘There is nothing wrong with the word ‘foundation,’ but it ‘feels a little old and a little controlling’
News World Market Environment Technology Personal Finance Politics Retail Business Economy Cryptocurrency Forex Stocks Market Commodities
Brooklyn Org explains its recent name change: ‘There is nothing wrong with the word ‘foundation,’ but it ‘feels a little old and a little controlling’
Jan 15, 2024 7:11 PM

  Brooklyn Community Foundation Rebrands as Brooklyn Org to Attract New Donors

  A New Name for a New Generation

  In an effort to appeal to a new generation of philanthropists, the Brooklyn Community Foundation is changing its name to Brooklyn Org. The name change is intended to convey that the foundation serves the residents of Brooklyn and highlights the expertise of its people, rather than suggesting a "top-down" approach sometimes taken by grantmakers.

  Jocelynne Rainey, who took over as president of the 14-year-old grantmaker two years ago, said, "There is nothing wrong with the word 'foundation.' But there's a perception that we're hearing from the next generation of givers that 'foundation' feels a little old and a little controlling."

  Rainey's goal is to attract new donors and make the grantmaker - which awards about $12 million each year to a range of causes, including justice reform, housing, and health - as recognizable as the Brooklyn Museum or the Brooklyn Academy of Music.

  A Changing Landscape for Philanthropy

  The name change comes at a time when an increasing number of Americans are giving philanthropy a critical eye. This year, 26% of people said they distrust philanthropy, up five percentage points from last year, according to a survey conducted by Independent Sector, a membership organization of nonprofits and grantmakers, and Edelman Data and Intelligence.

  Sruthi Sadhujan, senior strategy director at Hyperakt, a branding firm that has worked to recast the public image of several grantmakers, including the Ford Foundation, said that philanthropies wanting to totally shed their previous identities should exercise caution.

  Sadhujan said there is enormous pressure for foundations to shed their image as organizations that can simply write big checks. Rather than denying their power and influence, foundations should consider how to use their institutional heft as a force for good. Acknowledging their status and using the pull they have as a wealthy foundation might help grantees get a seat at the table with other elite institutions, including professional societies and prestigious universities.

  Brooklyn Org: A Model for Philanthropy

  Rainey says that no matter what people call it, Brooklyn Org is still a foundation. But she said the new name reflects different practices the foundation has put in place that let residents steer the course of the institution.

  The foundation has about $70 million in grantmaking assets it can use at its discretion and around $40 million in donor-advised funds, which are managed by the foundation but given out at the direction of the donors.

  All of the foundation's discretionary grantmaking, Rainey says, uses a participatory approach, where residents research and pick nonprofits to receive grants.

  "We want to be a model for how philanthropy can be different," she said. "And we want to be able to exhibit that in our name."

  Subscribe to the CFO Daily newsletter to keep up with the trends, issues, and executives shaping corporate finance. Sign up for free.

Comments
Welcome to financetom comments! Please keep conversations courteous and on-topic. To fosterproductive and respectful conversations, you may see comments from our Community Managers.
Sign up to post
Sort by
Show More Comments
Related Articles >
Copyright 2023-2024 - www.financetom.com All Rights Reserved