LONDON, April 10 (Reuters) - A positive correlation
between global oil benchmark Brent crude and U.S.
equities has reemerged in 2025, reflecting concern about the
slowing economy and the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump's
trade wars.
Asset classes moving in tandem presents a conundrum for
money managers, challenging ideas like commodities are a good
way to diversify portfolios as they are less likely to fall at
the same time as stocks. The current environment with widespread
growth fears has spurred investors to seek new strategies.
Since Trump took office on January 20, crude and U.S. stocks
have moved in lockstep, as concern about the outlook for the
global economy and growth have rattled sentiment across markets.
The one-month correlation between the two - a metric that
reflects how much two assets tend to follow one another, with
-1.0 reflecting no correlation at all and 1.0 reflecting a
near-perfect correlation - rose to as much as 0.9 in March.
"The oil price is moving today not because of inflation, but
because of growth and that's why oil and equities are becoming
more correlated," said Shaniel Ramjee, co-head of multi-asset
funds at Pictet Asset Management in London.
"The market is more worried about growth than anything.
Tariffs can increase short-term inflation but it's really the
impact on growth that's driving this correlation."
On Wednesday, Trump said he would temporarily lower the
duties he had just imposed on dozens of countries while further
ramping up pressure on China, sending stocks and oil higher. Oil
resumed falling on Thursday ahead of the U.S. stock market open.
"Oil and equities tend to highly correlate when concerns
about economic slowdown are rising," said Tamas Varga of oil
broker PVM.
"Demand prospects, together with the outlook for equities,
are at the whim of the chaotic policymaking of the U.S.
administration, which is presently negative."
A positive correlation between oil and equities is not that
rare, however. Brent and the S&P500 were strongly correlated for
most of the June-August period last year.
Tim Evans of advisory firm Evans on Energy said trading the
correlation presented at least two difficulties - uncertainty
over how long it will last and whether it's any easier to
forecast direction of the S&P 500 or the oil price.
"Those with a confident view of the S&P 500 may be better
off trading the index than trading oil," he said.
CUTTING OIL INVESTMENT
Some fund managers have cut back on investments in crude
futures, instead preferring other commodities such as gold. A
benchmark gold futures contract hit a record high last week.
"We don't have a positive view on oil. Tariffs are
definitely impacting the demand picture," said Luc Filip, head
of investments at SYZ Private Banking in Geneva.
Antonio Cavarero, head of investments at Generali Asset
Management, agrees.
"Oil is more exposed to the possible softening of the
economic cycle," Cavarero said. "In this moment you want to be
in corners of the market that are less exposed to unpredictable
decisions by policymakers."
Ramjee of Pictet Asset Management said the oil and stocks
correlation could weaken should the U.S. administration stop
short of its more extreme tariff threats.
"If the tariffs aren't that impactful or more scaled down,
we will likely see a decoupling," he said. "People will go for
oil to take advantage of that improved growth picture, but we're
not seeing this yet, there's still the possibility for a
negative surprise on growth."
For now, the funds he manages have built up a large position
in gold and gold mining stocks to diversify away from more
correlated markets. He's also trading less and putting on
smaller positions because of the volatility in markets.