AMSTERDAM, April 2 (Reuters) - A Dutch court will on
Tuesday hear Shell's appeal against a landmark climate
ruling which ordered it to drastically deepen planned greenhouse
gas emission cuts.
The district court in The Hague in 2021 ordered the oil and
gas giant to reduce its planet warming carbon emissions by 45%
by 2030 from 2019 levels.
The order related both to Shell's own emissions and those
caused by the buyers and users of its products. It came amid
rising pressure on energy companies from investors, activists
and governments to shift away from fossil fuels and rapidly ramp
up investment in renewables.
Shell has argued that the order lacks a legal base and says
companies cannot be held responsible for the emissions of their
clients.
"We agree that the world needs urgent climate action, but we
have a different view in how that goal should be achieved," the
company said in a statement on its website.
"By focusing on one company, and only on the supply of
energy rather than the demand for it, we believe the ruling is
ineffective and even counterproductive in addressing climate
change."
Friends of the Earth Netherlands, which brought the case,
said it was confident heading into the appeal.
"The scientific basis on which we've founded our claims
against Shell has only solidified," the group's lawyer Roger Cox
said.
"I am confident that we can once again convince the judges
that Shell needs to act in line with international climate
agreements."
Shell earlier this month weakened a 2030 carbon reduction
target and scrapped a 2035 objective, citing expectations for
strong gas demand and uncertainty in the energy transition, even
as it affirmed a plan to cut emissions to net zero by 2050.
The company in its statement before the appeal said it was
"not ignoring" the court order, pointing out its $10-15 billion
investments in low-carbon energy solutions between 2023 and the
end of 2025.
"We believe the actions we are taking are consistent with
the ruling and its end of 2030 timeline," the company said.
Shell now targets a 15-20% reduction in net carbon intensity
of its energy products by 2030, compared with 2016 intensity
levels. It had previously aimed for a 20% cut.
The court has planned four days of hearings for the appeal
this month. A verdict is expected in the second half of the
year.